| Review: I saw?? O movie with the kind of competition was curiosity.It along?? IGU exaggerated and overstated, as expected from Baz Luhrmann ra?? O?? Session. Leonardo DiCaprio was on the Gatsby?? S (the old songs) and maintaining a sense of familiarity. The script was adapted to the faithful?? Session and even helped me to understand more clearly da?? S novels topics. And while you're thinking, hearing dubstep D?? Jazz era would be jarring sound worked very well.but I would love it. And (mostly) Tobey Maguire fault.Gatsby appeared in the original story so big, it's not hard to forget about Nick. But it could be argued, and often?? S far as Nick, not Gatsby, where?? was the hero of the novel. Fitgeralds story, told from Nick's first-person perspective, it was just as good as Nick's story, Gatsby was just as big as Nick showed him that way.Unfortunately, Maguire fell completely flat in its role as a narrative guide. There was always so much else going on and so much Luhrmann's Dreamscape absorb that Maguire?? Keith get lost it all. And? with him? it was the audience. Without a strong presence Maguire, Nick lowered from its role as an interpreter of events would be simpler?? S another character (and quite forgettable one in it). Luhrmann was trying to keep Nicks narrative structure, allowing him to tell a story? first as a patient talking to his doctor in a sanatorium, then as a writer trying to explain their grief through prose. But?? Imple scenes came across (at best) to hard rock explanatory??'s Or (worst case), and Maguires uninspired take on an abbreviated version of the audiobook Great Gatsby.I wanted to love?? O movie. I they?? S. It was so many miracles? Ķīgu special?? CONFIDENCE. But without Nick (Tobey only one) to help understand people and events, angry, and half in love {it}, and extremely?? Yet having, I turned away. |
139 Seeds 
76 Peers
No comments:
Post a Comment